Creating New Nepal

Communism supposes that everyone can have an equal share in things such as wealth. Obviously, this seems ideal, genuinely it is impractical. In nature we see there is diversity ubiquitously, and everything is not equal. For instance in our own bodies there are some parts that are of more crucial to us than others. We would look after our face  as our own life, but we cut away our fingernails.  If you think simply, if this equality were literally attainable, it would then be hardly possible to sustain it. It would very easily be knocked out of this fake balance. Since, natural equilibrium in universe is not for all things to be equal.

 

In context to Nepal, today our country seek  moral order through communism. Because democracy has shrinkage the feeling of sacrifice; people want what they want. These days, people do frequent strike, give bribe, cuckold tax, import illegally, involve in red tape and still ask for freedom, what else do they want to plunder from government? And communism cannot exist here not because the ideology is flawed -but because human nature is flawed. By enforcing a class-free society with public resources and no private ownership, people have to get rid of self-indulgence, greed, desire to surpass beyond those around them, and private ownership. We define ourselves by what we possess, and we're all avid parasite, so communism cannot exist here. Whereas the mediating socialist ideas are quite popular in developed countries, supporting more help to the penurious group, and adequately  endeavor to equivalence things out in general, not like barefaced capitalism, that doesn't even stop shouting  "the rich get richer, the poor get poorer"

Communism is extreme but it does achieve the goals that they intended to. Such as they did erase the classicism and they did reduce unemployment considerably. Another benefit is the free government care; you work for little pocket money and the government supplied the rest. Why the original G7 countries were rich like Japan and UK that were limited in natural resources but the people had Wealth.Authoritarian China is trumping in global market, against so-called "democratic" United State. Because their government can actually quickly make the big decisions that eventually benefit their citizen, whereas the only difference in America is they try to pretend the involvement of people, instead of making the decisions themselves. But emphasizing, democracy more than limit slows down government process.

Laws and no one stand above the laws and approach to law is what makes people rich. Lack of authority had led our country to this state. If all worked together for the benefit of humanity as a whole instead of just for our well-being then I truly do believe that the notion of Communism can be helpful to create so-called “New Nepal”. Interfering government decision can only led country to vicious circle. But since we don’t, then we must possess democratic eye to find balance between Communism/Socialism with Capitalism.